It's a pathetic time of year in the sports world with the NHL and NBA seasons having wrapped up, no football to discuss (except the lockout which is just exhausting at this point) until late August, the women's World Cup just getting underway, the College World Series recently ending and Wimbledon hasn't yet concluded. The only constant right now is Major League Baseball and, unless you're a baseball purist AKA 70+ years of age, you probably don't care much about it until September and October. So I thought it would be fun to change things up a little bit. In my introductory post I mentioned that this blog would primarily address athletics, but we would also discuss other things in pop culture such as music. If you happened to come across my Facebook page within the last 15 hours, you've seen a small discussion about Chris Brown.
For those of you who don't know, Chris Brown is a young R and B singer who is probably most recognized for his ability to dance. Recently though, for some very dumb reason, he has tried his hand at rapping. Chances are you've heard his song "Look At Me Now" with Busta Rhymes and Lil' Wayne considering that you can find it playing somewhere on the radio at all times. But he's also on a song called "Snapbacks Back" which uses the very aggressive beat from Rick Ross and Meek Mill's "Tupac Back." Go take a listen if you haven't heard it unless you're at work. Then, you'll probably get fired. Anyway, I won't even get into the lyrical breakdown of Brown's verse, but it brings up an interesting debate: How important are song lyrics in evaluating the quality of a song? More importantly, when it comes to rap/hip hop, how does the lay-person decide what makes a good rapper?
I'll be the first to admit that there are some songs that have incredibly stupid, elementary lyrics that I still enjoy listening to. Take Soulja Boy's "Kiss Me Thru The Phone," for example (don't ask me why that's the first song that came to mind). I'm not afraid to say that I love the song, but I'd NEVER call Soulja Boy a "good" rapper. I have to laugh when I hear someone say how good of a rapper Soulja Boy is. What makes him good? Because his producer put together a beat that you enjoy listening to and he came up with a four-word hook? I'm not going to judge you if you tell me you like listening to his music, but don't tell me he's good. I respect Soulja Boy because he found a glitch in the matrix. His income is not a reflection of his talent. And unfortunately, that seems to be the case for a lot of "musicians" we hear on the radio today. Basically what I'm saying is that people need to be more conscious of the language they use, and that goes for music, sports, and just about anything else that people have opinions about.
I always bring it back to The Beatles. The dumbest thing I've ever heard anyone say is "The Beatles suck." My immediate response is always the same: "You're an idiot, this conversation is over." But I guess that's as closed-minded as the statement that I'm responding to. So, allow me to explain. The Beatles do not suck. I understand it's a matter of opinion, but if your opinion is that they "suck," then your opinion is wrong. You have every right to not enjoy listening to them, but NOBODY can argue that they weren't incredibly talented, influential musicians. The same goes for a guy like Lebron James. I don't like Lebron, but you'll never hear me say "Lebron sucks" with a straight face. I'm not telling you who you should and shouldn't like when it comes to music or anything else, I'm just saying that talent is not arguable. You either have it or you don't. Unless, of course, we're talking about Tim Duncan. Cause he sucks.
Footnote: I don't even like Soulja Boy's verses. I just love Sammie killing it on the hook.
"Is that yo ass, or yo momma half reindeer?" -Nelly from "Shake Ya Tailfeather"
-Brusk Dollas
